![\"\"](\"http:\/\/msmagazine.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/15534532800_babc9dfa2f_k-1024x683.jpg\")
<\/p>\nNext week, the Vatican will open the World Meeting of Families in Dublin, Ireland\u2014just one month after the ominous anniversary of Humanae Vitae, the Vatican policy banning birth control. While the hierarchy \u201ccelebrates\u201d 50 years of Humanae Vitae, a ban that has caused half a century of harm to the world\u2019s poorest communities,\u00a0and as we continue to see a wave of attacks against women\u2019s reproductive rights at home and abroad, it is important to understand the role the doctrine has\u00a0in shaping policy.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Sia Sandi, a student midwife from The School of Midwifery in Masuba at Makeni Regional Hospital in Sierra Leone, works with a patient as part of H4+, a joint effort by UNAIDS, UNFPA, UNICEF, UN Women, WHO and the World Bank, governments and civil societies wherein officials and partners team up to address the reproductive maternal, newborn and child health issues and help coordinate support for national maternal and newborn health policies and plans. (Abbie Trayler-Smith for H6 Partners<\/a> \/ Creative Commons)<\/p>\n In the late 1960s and early 1970s,\u00a0women were taking charge over their lives like never before\u2014look no further, for example, than the founding of Ms. and other outlets of feminist expression\u2014and at the Second Vatican Council, which closed in 1965, the Catholic hierarchy issued reforms to better connect with the modern needs of its faithful.\u00a0In light of these changes, Catholics were shocked when, in July 1968, Pope Paul VI issued Humanae Vitae, reaffirming the hierarchy’s ban on contraception.<\/p>\n In the midst of what could have been a moment to bring the church up-to-date with the lived realities of women, Humane Vitae instead led to a profound disconnect between the hierarchy and its faithful\u2014especially its women.\u00a0The ban was not supported by the Vatican\u2019s own birth control commission,<\/a> and it was met with immediate disapproval by everyday Catholics. It was also a source of disappointment to John Rock<\/a>\u2014the founder of the birth control pill and a devout Catholic.<\/p>\n A Harris Poll in 1965 found that 52 percent of American Catholics thought the hierarchy should allow Cath\u00adolics to use birth control<\/a> and 33 percent were unsure.\u00a0Today, that rift has only widened: In\u00a02018, a\u00a0poll of American Catholics<\/a> by BRS and YouGov found that 83 percent disagree or are ambivalent about the ban; in majority Catholic Ireland, disapproval of the ban is even higher,<\/a> at 91 percent; in Kenya, where the hierarchy is influential, 70 percent of Catholics<\/a> disagree with or are unsure about the ban.<\/p>\n Despite its unpopularity, Humanae Vitae has guided innumerable policies that impact the ability of women to make free choices over their bodies\u2014and\u00a0the Catholic hierarchy\u2019s political battles, including the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops\u2019 fight against the Affordable Care Act\u2019s birth control benefit<\/a> and the hierarchy\u2019s rejection of contraceptives in global family planning<\/a> and HIV\/AIDS prevention<\/a> programs.<\/p>\n The most damning legacy of Humanae Vitae has been its impact on the world\u2019s most underserved communities. While many Catholics in the developed world defy the ban on birth control, women in the developing world do not have that luxury. Today, an estimated 214 million women globally have an unmet need for contraception, which contributes to high rates of maternal mortality and stunts other efforts to end extreme poverty.<\/p>\n Despite these serious concerns, the Catholic hierarchy continues to strongly oppose modern contraception\u2014especially on the African continent, which has the world\u2019s lowest rate of contraceptive use and\u00a0the most rapidly growing Catholic population globally.<\/p>\n The Catholic population across Africa has increased by 238 percent since 1980, and Catholics are predicted to account for nearly 25 percent of the population by 2040. Faith-based organizations affiliated with the Catholic Church in some of the most remote communities across Africa are on the ground providing food, water, shelter, healthcare and other basic needs to communities;\u00a0in sub-Saharan Africa, faith-based organizations deliver drugs on average to 43 percent of the population<\/a>.<\/p>\n Where local governments are weak in Africa, Catholic organizations are doing the work they can’t\u2014and as a result, they often have credibility and trust from the communities they serve. When a government tries to implement a family planning program that the bishops disagree with, the bishops have a lot of power and influence to block these programs\u2014and they wield it despite the negative impacts sure to come for women and girls.\u00a0In Nigeria, Uganda, Kenya and other countries, national bishops\u2019 conferences have put significant pressure on authorities to block family planning progress<\/a>.<\/p>\n Kenya has made great strides in family planning\u2014they have surpassed their Family Planning 2020 commitments over the past few years and are on track to achieve their 2020 target of 58 percent of contraceptive coverage two years early<\/a>. This progress is not easily sustained\u2014especially in hard-to-reach areas where Catholic and other faith-based facilities make up a lion\u2019s share of the healthcare system and can deny contraception in their facilities. Faith-based facilities provide healthcare services to\u00a0more than 40 percent\u00a0of Kenyans<\/a>.<\/p>\n Humanae Vitae has also impacted access to birth control for underserved communities in the U.S. Under President Trump, the bishops and other religious conservatives have fought to expand refusal clauses to allow corporations to deny birth control coverage to working women for \u201cmoral\u201d or religious reasons, and more recently, the administration reshaped the nation\u2019s Title X program\u2014the only federal program dedicated solely to affordable family planning and sexual care for low-income patients\u2014to limit care for patients who rely on it. The Department of Health and Human Services’ new guidelines mandate that\u00a0Title X providers place a \u201cmeaningful emphasis\u201d on abstinence and do not make any mention of contraception or abortion<\/a>.<\/p>\n Catholics the world over have soundly rejected Humanae Vitae and its out-of-touch approach to the very moral needs of women\u2014but it continues to guide policies that impact Catholics and non-Catholics alike. Sadly, those impacted most by this doctrine are the women around the world who continue to live in conditions in which their right to make their own ethical decisions over their bodies and their lives are denied to them.<\/p>\n Cynthia Romero is the director of communications at Catholics for Choice, where she serves as spokesperson and manages press and digital communications to elevate the voices of Catholics that trust women to make ethical reproductive decisions. She is a former Obama administration appointee at USAID and held roles in various human rights organizations. She has a Bachelor\u2019s degree from Princeton University and an MA from Queens University Belfast.<\/p>\n The post Humanae Vitae and a Half-Century of Harm to Women Around the World<\/a> appeared first on Ms. Magazine Blog<\/a>.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/msmagazine.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/CINDY-COLOR-1-150x150.png\")
<\/p>\n![\"ms.](\"http:\/\/msmagazine.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/2.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n